![Workers Not Entitled to Wages for Period Not Worked During CIRP: NCLAT upholds Layoff Notice, Approved Resolution Plan Binding on All Stakeholders [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/07/500x300_2117525-nclat-resolution-plan-taxscan.jfif "Workers Not Entitled to Wages for Period Not Worked During CIRP: NCLAT upholds Layoff Notice, Approved Resolution Plan Binding on All Stakeholders [Read Order]")
Workers Not Entitled to Wages for Period Not Worked During CIRP: NCLAT upholds Layoff Notice, Approved Resolution Plan Binding on All Stakeholders [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at New Delhi, held that workers are entitled to wages during CIRP only if the...
![Pre-March 2020 Default Not Protected by S.10A Despite Contractual Cure Period: NCLAT upholds CIRP Admission [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/08/250x150_2117832-nclat-upholds-cirp-admission-taxscan.jfif "Pre-March 2020 Default Not Protected by S.10A Despite Contractual Cure Period: NCLAT upholds CIRP Admission [Read Order]")
![Contractual Cure Periods Do Not Shift the Date of Default for Section 10A Purposes: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/250x150_2116493-contractual-cure-periods-do-not-shift-date-default-section-10a-purposes-nclat-taxscan.webp "Contractual Cure Periods Do Not Shift the Date of Default for Section 10A Purposes: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![NCLAT allows Correction Application, Orders Correction of Errors in Previous Order Pertaining to CIRP Status and Pending High Court Litigation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/250x150_2116477-nclat-allows-correction-application-orders-correction-errors-previous-order-pertaining-cirp-status-pending-high-court-litigation-taxscan.webp "NCLAT allows Correction Application, Orders Correction of Errors in Previous Order Pertaining to CIRP Status and Pending High Court Litigation [Read Order]")
![Pre‑Existing Disputes on Supply & Assignment: NCLAT upholds NCLT’s Dismissal of K-sure’s S 9 Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/250x150_2116732-preexisting-disputes-on-supply-assignment-nclat-upholds-nclts-dismissal-of-k-sures-s-9-petition-taxscan.webp "Pre‑Existing Disputes on Supply & Assignment: NCLAT upholds NCLT’s Dismissal of K-sure’s S 9 Petition [Read Order]")
Balance Sheet Entries as ‘Other Long-Term Liabilities’ Confirm Financial Debt u/s 5(8): NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that consistent balance sheet entries under “other long-term liabilities” are credible indicators of financial debt under Section 5(8)...
![Balance Sheet Entries as ‘Other Long-Term Liabilities’ Confirm Financial Debt u/s 5(8): NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/500x300_2116723-balance-sheet.webp "Balance Sheet Entries as ‘Other Long-Term Liabilities’ Confirm Financial Debt u/s 5(8): NCLAT [Read Order]")
NCLAT Rejects Appeal to Revive Belated Claim Post-Resolution Plan Approval Due to Contradictory Documents and Lack of Payment Proof [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a claim seeking recognition as a financial creditor in a...
![NCLAT Rejects Appeal to Revive Belated Claim Post-Resolution Plan Approval Due to Contradictory Documents and Lack of Payment Proof [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/500x300_2116487-nclat-rejects-appeal-revive-belated-cliam-post-resolution-plan-approval-due-contradictory-documents-lack-payment-proof-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Rejects Appeal to Revive Belated Claim Post-Resolution Plan Approval Due to Contradictory Documents and Lack of Payment Proof [Read Order]")
NCLAT Admits CCI Clarification: WhatsApp Advertising Data Sharing also Subject to Opt‑Out and Revocable Consent [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has delivered a crucial clarification in the ongoing competition law proceedings involving WhatsApp LLC and its...
![NCLAT Admits CCI Clarification: WhatsApp Advertising Data Sharing also Subject to Opt‑Out and Revocable Consent [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114576-nclat-new-delhi-cci-whatsapp-data-sharing-optout-revocable-consent-whatsapp-data-sharing-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Admits CCI Clarification: WhatsApp Advertising Data Sharing also Subject to Opt‑Out and Revocable Consent [Read Order]")
No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Principal Bench at New Delhi has upheld the dismissal of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, holding that no ...
![No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/500x300_2111279-nclat-affirms-nclt-order-rejecting-application-taxscan.jfif "No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]")
NCLT to Reconsider Rs. 92 Lakh Penalty Imposed for Non-Holding of AGMs Due to Directorial Deadlock: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, remanded the matter to NCLT Mumbai to reconsider the ₹92 lakh penalty imposed for non-holding of AGMs from 2016 to ...
Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, ruled that suspended directors of a corporate debtor cannot demand access to valuation reports rejected by the...
![Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/13/500x300_2111901-suspended-directors-no-right-valuation-reports-rejected-coc-ibc-nclat-taxscan.webp "Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, has delivered a detailed and consequential judgment holding that shareholders can be “aggrieved persons” under Section 61 of the...
![Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113269-shareholder-cirp-nclat-any-person-aggrieved-park-energy-case-taxscan.webp "Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]")